Monday, 13 August 2012

Related Posts

Comments (12)

  • explorer9360

    From Doug Wead... "RNC: Ron Paul delegates not welcome in Tampa"! http://dougwead.wordpress.com/2012/08/14/rnc-ron-paul-delegates-not-welcome-in-tampa/

    Here is the message coming out of Headquarters tonight:

    The Committee on Contests recently issued a ruling on the
    establishment’s challenge to Ron Paul’s delegates and alternates who
    were duly elected in Maine, and on our challenges to the outright
    cheating that occurred in Louisiana, Massachusetts, and Oregon
    (alternates only).

    Despite Ron Paul’s supporters being so clearly in the right in these
    four states, the establishment is so far refusing to rule fairly and
    seat our duly elected delegates and/or alternates.

    Here’s a brief summary of the bogus challenge made by the GOP
    establishment against us in Maine, as well as our challenges to the
    cheating that occurred elsewhere:

    In Maine, where Ron Paul supporters held a clear majority at the State Convention,
    the establishment is attempting to unseat the state’s duly elected
    delegates and alternates – acting like sore losers in the process. The
    challenge to our delegates in Maine is so bogus that Republican Governor
    Paul LePage – who is one of the few delegates not being challenged by
    the establishment – has declared he will not attend the Republican
    National Convention unless Ron Paul’s delegates and alternates who were
    duly elected are seated;

    In Louisiana, establishment “big wigs” used threats,
    intimidation, and force – literally smashing the bones of one gentleman
    – to shut out Ron Paul supporters who had a clear majority at the State
    Convention;

    In Oregon, the State Chairman blatantly ignored the votes of the Convention,
    taking it upon himself to replace the duly elected alternate delegates
    with an “appointed” slate chocked-full of establishment cronies;

    In Mitt Romney’s home state of Massachusetts, corrupt Party officials changed the rules after the game was over – kicking out Ron Paul’s duly elected delegates and alternates and replacing them with their hand-picked cronies.
  • explorer9360

    UPDATE:

    Introduction to Ron Paul (1)
  • explorer9360

    UPDATE:

    Intro to Ron Paul (2)
  • explorer9360

    UPDATE:

    Quick Explanation of Ron Paul's Plan
  • explorer9360

    UPDATE:

    Ron Paul On Property Rights (A Way of Environmental Control)
  • explorer9360

    UPDATE:

    Ron Paul On Assassination
  • explorer9360

    UPDATE:

    Foreign Policy -1 (Wars and Terrorism)
  • explorer9360

    UPDATE:

    Foreign Policy 2 - Aid
  • explorer9360

    UPDATE:

    Economics Question: Is returning to the "Gold Standard" like spinning gold out of straw?

    Since the news media covered up Ron Paul the ONLY introduction any of the unliberal "Liberals" got to Ron Paul was through a couple of comedy shows that have a ton of writers but no economists on staff. I could explain how demand and supply curves move and how gold + silver (both of which are IN Ron Paul's plan) in addition with other precious metals like Platinum COULD be used to stabilize the currency... simply by issuing notes according to the value of the metal it's connected to. Regular fiat money would find it's place in the market (lower to these new gold/silver/platinum currency notes) and the whole process would probably take about 15-20 years to find a long term equilibrium in the market place. Anyways, even if it wasn't for these comedians creating a mockery of Ron Paul while there was no compensatory media coverage of him, now the fake liberals of the news media fellowship are convinced the poor guy is a nut. He's old and talks like an old person. He like price stability. Every old guy I have ever met ANYWHERE in the world thinks and talks the same way. I don't care about price stability as much as long as the economy is growing... but I think it's an intriguing idea (especially since most of our history is based on such currencies) that can be implemented slowly and surely. Back to news media nonsense.

    Note:

    If you can't listen to the other side of an argument with an open mind you are NOT a liberal.
  • explorer9360

    More: http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/420369/october-22-2012/virginia-s-voter-fraud-fighter At 2 mins & 55 secs Stephen points out that election fraud is a Federal Crime. GOP did you hear that? "10:00pm EST – All media outlets spend two hours declaring Mitt Romney the overwhelming winner of the Nevada Republican Caucus in a landslide victory. Only 4 percent of the vote is in." http://www.examiner.com/article/paul-camp-cries-fraud-over-nevada-caucus-results [ From "Mitt Romney & His Allies Cover-Up Of Ron Paul" http://explorer9360.xanga.com/767339995/mitt-romney--his-allies-cover-up-of-ron-paul/ (Just this one)] - If it wasn't for yall controlling 90% of media http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-april-27-2011/exclusive---bernie-sanders-extended-interview-pt--1 yall could never have gotten this far with Mitt The Liar. 
  • explorer9360

    "There is nothing in the basic principles of liberalism to make it a stationary creed, there are no hard-and-fast rules fixed once and for all. The fundamental principle that in the ordering of our affairs we should make as much use as possible of the spontaneous forces of society, and resort as little as possible to coercion, is capable of an infinite variety of applications. There is, in particular, all the difference between deliberately creating a system within which competition will work as beneficially as possible, and passively accepting institutions as they are. Probably nothing has done so much harm to the liberal cause as the wooden insistence of some liberals on certain rough rules of thumb, above all the principle of laissez-faire. Yet in a sense this was necessary and unavoidable. Against the innumerable interests who could show that particular measures would confer immediate and obvious benefits on some, while the harm they caused was much more indirect and difficult to see, nothing short of some hard-and-fast rule would have been effective. And since a strong presumption in favour of industrial liberty had undoubtedly been established, the temptation to present it as a rule which knew no exceptions was too strong always to be resisted." from F.A Hayek's The Road To Serfdom - Page 17
  • explorer9360

    UPDATE: Summary of "Socialism", Keynesian Economics & "Roa... -

    Summary of "Socialism", Keynesian Economics & "Road to Serfdom" (by F.A.Hayek) http://www.culturesocietyblog.com/2012/10/summary-of-socialism-keynesian.html

  • Sign in to Comment

  • Give eProps (?)

About this Entry

Tags

Who recommended?

Who gave the eProps?

2 eProps from: