Wednesday, 18 July 2012
Mitt Romney is calling EVERYTHING that hurts him an "attack" on him. Vetting involves asking questions. If he won't answer ANY questions that go even an inch into his character or past record, why should he be allowed to run for President? What kind of precedent does that set? He seems more like one of those bankers being investigated in countries with some transparency left. What if he is like them! He must be vetted. This is the United States Presidency we are talking about here!!!
Nevada's "None of the Above" Is Fearsome Foe for GOP The whole message of Mitt Romney's campaign is "I'm not Barack Obama," while a Nevada foe demonstrates all the conservative credentials Mitt lacks.
If he just said, "hey, I'm the next guy in line so I get to be GOP nominee this time round" that would have been fine. Then he could have just told the truth and the GOP would have followed him (they are a very traditional lot, they would follow thier leader over a cliff if they were told to do so. Thinking ability is close to zero. They may be able to eat, though not properly... even thier obesity rate - and therefore hormonal imbalances - are off the charts! For example check out how red Limbaugh goes as he bounces like a beach ball on his chair!). In fact the main currency that Mitt Romney is playing with is rumour!!! Rush Limbaugh & GOP's strategy is to take baseless, unresearched rumor as fact...
Why should Mitt Romney be disqualified from the US Presidency?
Because he can't prove ANYTHING that he is running on. His whole strategy is , like Stephen Colbert put it above, "I'm not Obama".
Well, I got a message for you Romney, so was Hitler!
(i.e. Hitler was NOT Obama as well. The point I'm making is... policies and personal character is a MUCH better way to select leaders! Some might say it's the only way to select leaders. But others don't want to know. They just want the 'black guy gone'. So the fact that we know nothing about who Mitt Romney is means NOTHING to them. Anyone who would vote for the President of the United States without examining the policies and character of the person they are voting for are either too dumb and bigoted to care OR they don't have thier country's or party's best interests at heart.)
Can a person really run for the Presidency now completely UN-vetted?
NOT ONE OF MITT ROMNEY'S CLAIMS CAN BE PROVEN. HE HAS THE TRACK RECORD OF A PAIR OF FLIP FLOPS AND HE WANT"S HIS BASE TO VOTE FOR HIM JUST FOR THAT!!!!!
Mitt says he will be a better job creator because of his business experience but he can't prove he actually created ANY jobs while being at Bain...
HELL, Romney can't even prove the measly 100,000 "net jobs" he claims to have added over the years:
"Mitt Romney says he created 100,000 jobs while at Bain Capital. Anderson Cooper is Keeping Them Honest."
On top of that ... ALL the details of his business dealings and his sources of income, he keeps hidden...
Or as Erin Burnett puts it, 'Mitt Romney is a businessman NOT a politician like John McCain... nor is he a wife, so he must release his taxes!'...
Why is Mitt Romney hiding his taxes since he entered public office in the 1990's?
Well, I've made a list of possible reason here... Mitt Romney Is Trying To Hide Something!!!! and here... Mitt Romney Isn't Trying Anymore. He's LITERALLY Hiding Something.
BUT... the breaking news is that Mitt Romney HAS BEEN CAUGHT in potential fraud!!!!
Satire: Mitt Romney uses an age-old ruse to explain how his time at Bain Capital wasn't a conflict of interest, and selectively releases his tax returns as required by law...
Notice At 50 seconds: A young Mitt Romney (from many years before he decided to run for the Presidency, obviously)... tells his blind trust what it can OR cannot do.
Moving forward to today, Mitt Romney denies he knows what his OWN "blind trust" was doing!!!! Really!!! Is being "not Obama" so good a reason that you would literally vote for a thief? Just look at the evidence there is for Mitt Romney as a Robber Baron! Wow! When Texas began writing a bill against critical thinking skills for kids... you would think it would take some time between passing the bill and it taking effect!
EXCLUSIVE: Romney Invested Millions in Chinese Firm That Profited on US Outsourcing The GOP candidate decries China poaching US jobs. But at Bain he held a large stake in a Chinese company that did just that.
Notes from video...
2:40 lol! Mitt Romney NEVER said WHERE he would create jobs...(combine this with the fact that ANYONE can tell thier blnd trust where they can invest... you have proof that Mitt Romney is trying to commit fraud against the American People and the Republican Party (also called lies to hide incriminating evidence).
3:30-4 mins: He had the title of CEO AND got a salary of $100,000 - He retired "retroactively". i.e. it's like OJ Simpson saying he actually left the house a day before his wife got murdered even though there is proof of him being in the house that same day.
In other words...
From Maddow Blog: Regarding Bain Capital, Mitt Romney is being forced to effectively tell the public, "Sure I was the CEO of my own firm, and sure I was paid handsomely, and sure I filed formal documents that said I was in charge, but don't worry, the buck stops somewhere else."
Mitt Romney is unelectable in a democracy.
Is he electable is the United States Of America?
Why does Mitt Romney keep saying his money was made legally? Because he argues for corporations being people... and this is the kinds of rights corporations have...
Satire: An actual Super PAC Corporation by a Comedy show! A Shell Corporation... Switching fundraising approach by creating a company (approx 4 mins into video) - this new company is called a 501 (c)4 - Allows donations from unknown donors , notice the dramatic increase in donations! (the example used is Karl Rove's Super Pac and a new one he created to shield it);
Only thieves try to hide thier pasts and past taxes filings.
News Report: Romney's Account of His Departure From Bain Undercut by... Romney Testimony
EXCLUSIVE: Romney Invested Millions in Chinese Firm That Profited on US Outsourcing
The GOP candidate decries China poaching US jobs. But at Bain he held a large stake in a Chinese company that did just that.
The Romney campaign and Bain Capital have insisted that Romney departed Bain in February 1999 to head the troubled 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City and had no involvement in the private equity firm's deals after that point—a contention that has been challenged by the Obama campaign. But the Global-Tech Appliances transactions occurred long before Romney jetted off to Utah.
Brookside downsized its Global-Tech holdings later in 1998. An SEC filing submitted on December 21, 1998, reported that the Bain affiliate now controlled only 4.63 percent of the company's shares. But Brookside was sharing its stake in Global-Tech with Sankaty High Yield Asset Investors LTD—a Bermuda-based corporation of which Romney was the "the sole shareholder, a director, and President." That is, Romney had split his Global-Tech holdings between two of his various business entities. (The SEC filing doesn't indicate why he did that.)
Sankaty is a story in itself. It was recently the focus of an Associated Press investigation that reported that Sankaty "is among several Romney holdings that have not been fully disclosed" and that there is a "mystery surrounding" Sankaty. Reporting on this Romney entity, Vanity Fair noted that "investments in tax havens such as Bermuda raise many questions, because they are in 'jurisdictions where there is virtually no tax and virtually no compliance,' as one Miami-based offshore lawyer put it." With Sankaty, Romney was using a mysterious Bermuda-based entity to invest in a Chinese firm that thrived on US outsourcing.
In early 1999, Romney's investment in Global-Tech expanded again. An SEC report filed on March 25, 1999, stated that Brookside and Sankaty at this stage owned 9.11 percent of the firm's stock. Romney was still listed as the sole shareholder and president of both Brookside and Sankaty.
By this point, according to the open-to-question account offered by Bain and the Romney campaign, Romney no longer had any involvement in Bain deals. But the series of SEC filings show active Brookside and Sankaty trading in Global-Tech Appliances while Romney fully controlled these firms. The two Romney companies repeatedly changed their ownership stake in this Chinese firm, which was not shy about its dependence on outsourcing. In its 2001 annual report , Global-Tech noted that US outsourcing was essential to its prospects: "Household appliance companies are focusing on their primary strengths of marketing and distribution, while increasingly outsourcing product development and manufacturing…Our ability and commitment to develop new and innovative, high quality products at a low cost has allowed us to benefit from the increased outsourcing of product development and manufacturing by our customers."
In August 2000, Brookside and Sankaty sold their interest in Global-Tech, according to the SEC documents . With these filings disclosing minimum details about Romney's investment in Global-Tech, there is no telling how much money he made—or lost—on the deal.
Ann Romney's Role (set him up to look good and help hide his gaffes & lack of policy explanations)...
Extension for this trick: "These are NOT the taxes you are looking for" Mitt Romney & Karl Rove...
The Paul Ryan EXOPOSOTHON Link Ring...
The MITT ROMNEY EXOPOSOTHON Link Ring...
Rick Santorum's Personal Link Ring...
On Fox News...
1. Bill O'Reilly Defends His Nazi Analogies.
2. 24 Hour Nazi Party People.
3. Glen Beck's Nazi Tourette's Syndrome.
Moment Of Zen: Glenn Beck agrees with the CIA... that Osama should attack America!!!!
"Advance, and never halt, for advancing is perfection. Advance and do not fear the thorns in the path, for they draw only corrupt blood." Khalil Gibran (Khalil Gibran was a Catholic Christian from Lebanon)
On My "Rhetoric": Everything in my blogs is proven. You want rhetoric based on lies then you can go back to the arguments between the Founding Fathers. You can't touch my proofs.
1. Founding Fathers arguing in context of today's politics...
The only thing different this election is Mitt Romney using Newt Gingrich's tactic when Newt gets caught lying, i.e. you're getting mean be polite! Well, the founding fathers didn't do that. Let's see if Mitt Romney can handle truthful attacks against his outright and proven lies (see above).
2. Mitt Romney's Is Using Divisive politics like when he endorsed Scott Walker who divided his State so badly he went through a recall election - He was doing the opposite of Ronald Regan too! (i.e. Mitt is DEFINITELY using Frank Luntz - see video of Frant Luntz above)